Prescott’s New Sign

December 21st, 2006 1

I’m sure many of you will have seen the story that Mr.Prescott has spent £645 of tax money on changing his office sign. And for the most part I agree it’s a complete waste of money. I did, however, find ITV’s report on the story a bit laughable, and at worst the kind of sensationalist repoting that I hate.

To demonstrate the high cost of Prescott’s sign the reporter was seen buying a “sign” in a near by prontaprint shop. They then went on to say “This cost us £9, that’s a difference of £636 that Mr. Prescott could have saved the tax payer.”

What they didn’t point out was that the “sign” that they’d had mad was simply a printed piece of A4 paper (£9 was a bit of a rip-off to be honest) where as the sign for the deputy Prime Minsters office obviously needed to be a little more robust than that.

Oh well, a bit random I guess, but it really wound me up. Maybe it’s all the Christmas shopping addling my brain.

One Comment ↓

About This Post

Post Categories

14
Rant

Post Views: 5078

One Comment (+0 in the moderation queue).

#1 On April 25th, 2007 at 12:27 pm Alex said...

gravtar

Thank You

Have Your Say...

Read Me

Sick of typing in this information? You can now . (new features for registerd members coming soon!)





Browse By Category

47
Personal
34
Events
31
Web
24
Random Crap
20
People
18
Site
18
Faith
16
Places
16
Geek
14
Reviews
14
Rant
13
Design
11
Technology
8
Interesting
5
Glaxstar
4
Films
4
Gigs
4
Walsall
4
Littlehampton
3
Theology
3
Opinion
2
General
2
Lichfield
2
Trinity
1
Music
1
Brownhills
1
Freelance
1
Promotional
1
Running

Advertise on roobottom.com from just £15 per month. Contact me to find out more.

advertise on roobottom »